Pickful

探索最新

· 3週

当下Web3正告别概念泡沫，进入合规落地、传统金融深度入链的新阶段。RWA现实资产代币化持续爆发，传统债券、存款、权益加速链上流转，打通虚实经济壁垒。跨链基础设施不断完善，多链资产互通更高效。叠加监管框架逐步清晰、AI链上赋能升级，Web3正在从去中心化实验，变成可落地、可长期演进的数字新经济体系。

deepidea

· 3週

Self-Consumption Ratio: par's External Volume Rose ~80% in a Day. Which Ruler Values Its Token?

Two metrics for valuing a launchpad token: the self-consumption ratio (platform token volume ÷ total platform volume) and the zero-multiplier law for buybacks. Worked on par and Pons: par's external volume rose ~80% in a day and its ex-self-consumption P/S fell from ~38x to ~16x.

The Coin Factory: Robinhood Chain Launchpads, Seen Through par

web3头条

· 3週

麦肯锡在招聘面试中引入 AI 模拟客户对话

科技热点:麦肯锡在招聘面试中引入 AI 模拟客户对话

Web3 今日热点賞金

moon

· 3週

英伟达 CEO 黄仁勋对德国总理默茨表示：

“我也听您说过，希望在创新与监管之间找到平衡。

如果一个产业无法蓬勃发展，那就根本没有什么可以监管的。”

来源：https://x.com/clashreport/status/2112252739677979041

· 3週

你的AI下属，不简单 書籍 5.00 USDC

2026年，你的同事可能已经用AI干完了你一整天的活，而你还在一行行搬信息。差距不在谁更努力，在谁把AI智能体（Agent）当成了下属。本书不堆名词、不讲原理，只教职场人一件事：怎么把Agent变成一支24小时待命、不交社保、越用越懂你的数字团队。从周报、PPT、邮件、会议纪要到数据整理，五条办公室通用工作流手把手带你上手；再讲透“总控思维”——拆任务、写清楚要求、验收，这是AI越强越值钱的核心能力。你不必焦虑被取代。真正会发生的是：会用Agent的人，取代不会用的人。读完这本书，你会拥有一支数字下属，并在AI时代把饭碗端得更稳。无论你是普通职员、管理者，还是想用AI给自己加杠杆的自由职业者，这本书都能让你明天上班就用得上。

moon

· 3週

Argus for Agents 已登陆 @arc。

给你的智能体一笔，让它开始工作。

在 @Uniswap 上发行代币，并可直接通过钱包买入、卖出、锁仓和领取创作者费用。

所有操作都能通过 Argus MCP 或 @circle CLI 完成。

每个智能体都有一席之地。

来源：https://x.com/Arguspad/status/2112575066701767160

爱游泳的鱼

· 3週

Paraverse 平行云：做云XR、实时渲染、3D数字资产和Web3交易平台，品牌为 Paraverse，代币相关为 PVS。 Parallel Finance 的 PARA：波卡生态借贷协议，代币代码是 PARA，不是 PAR。 ParaToken PARA：以太坊上的社区代币，主要用于启动板、NFT市场等场景，体量较小。如果是 Paraverse 这类 XR+Web3 项目，运营重点会是：开发者生态、3D资产上链、渲染节点激励、行业客户落地、PVS/PARA 使用场景设计。#发币平台 #加密货币 #pickful #par

PAR 运营研究

moon

· 3週

看看我们在 Idealab AI 发布的 120 万个免费商业创意：
http://www.idealab.ai

50 多年来，我一直痴迷于寻找那些值得转化为公司的问题。

今天，我推出了 @Idea_lab_AI，希望借助 AI，以我独自一人永远无法达到的规模应用这一过程。

超过 120 万个商业创意，全部免费探索和使用。

你会创造什么？

#IdealabAI #创业

来源：https://x.com/Bill_Gross/status/2112221076961050760

中文 English

0:00 最近，人工智能做了一件让我震惊的事。

0:03 我发现它能超越我这个想商业点子的超能力。

0:08 如果人工智能变得这么厉害，那我的角色是什么？

0:11 然后我意识到，如果我能放大这种能力，就能免费把它分享给全世界。

0:17 这让我非常兴奋。

0:18 我们开发的超过一百万个商业点子全部免费提供。

0:22 快来 exploreidealab.ai，给我们反馈，找到一个值得打造的点子，为世界带来重要的积极影响。

0:00 Recently, AI did something that stopped me cold.

0:03 I found that it could outperform my own superpower coming up with business

0:07 ideas.

0:08 What was my role if AI had gotten so good at this?

0:11 Then I realized, if I could scale that ability, I could give it to the world

0:16 for free.

0:17 That got me very excited.

0:18 The more than one million business ideas we have developed are completely free.

0:22 Come exploreidealab.ai, give us feedback, and find an idea worth building and

0:27 make an

0:27 important positive impact on the world.

deepidea

· 3週

One NVIDIA, Five Issuers, Six Tokens: Which One Do You Actually Hold?

The same NVIDIA exists as six tokens from five issuers on five chains. A Robinhood Stock Token is a Jersey debt security backed by custodied shares, wrapped in an ERC-20 with freeze powers. Three types of stock token, issuer-sponsored, custody-backed and synthetic, decide where a token can go.

Robinhood Goes Onchain: A Broker's First Year

moon

· 3週

突发：埃隆·马斯克表示，货币将变得无关紧要，未来的货币将以功率、质量和能量来衡量。

“我认为货币将以基础物理指标来衡量，比如功率、瓦数和吨位、质量和能量。”

来源：https://x.com/cb_doge/status/2112588436846911907

中文 English

0:00 未来看来，金钱将变得无关紧要。我的意思是，货币仍然存在，但我认为货币将以基本物理指标来衡量，比如功率、瓦特数、吨位、质量和能量。基本上就是质量和能量。

0:25 传统货币未来将不重要，这只是我的猜测。我觉得这是显而易见的。一旦经济规模远超地球，满足人类所有可能的需求就非常容易了。

0:46 如果你的经济规模比地球大几个数量级，那么提供人类想要的商品和服务非常简单。

0:57 那么作为人类，我们该做什么？什么赋予我们意义？我们如何组织自己？

1:04 我说的是，你是否也为这个问题感到困惑？我们会找到快乐的方法，就像退休的人似乎相对幸福，尽管他们不工作。

1:18 但我认为现实是，人类不可能…没有什么是AI和机器人做不到且做得更好的。一种比喻是园艺，你不必自己种水果蔬菜，可以直接去店里买。

1:37 但有时候人们喜欢自己种水果蔬菜，邀请朋友做饭，这也是一种不错的体验。

1:46 那创作艺术或这种类型的创造力呢？这更符合人类吗？

1:51 是的，你当然可以创作艺术或做任何你想做的事情。

1:56 我们喜欢把这称为前所未有的技术变革时代，但历史学家会回顾1890年代，那时电力、电话、汽车、地铁、无线电和电影几乎同时出现。这带来了很多变化，

2:15 但通常也导致贫富差距扩大，出现了许多剥削者，很多人拿起干草叉，认为这是坏事，现在也有类似的回响。我们有办法防止这种情况吗？鉴于财富的巨大增长，

2:33 我们是否会像1890年代那样，将某些事务置于公共领域，比如普及免费高中教育？我们会说，“比如说医疗保健，直接纳入公共领域”，这样可以缓解部分民众对现状的强烈反感。

2:50 这就是一些发生的事。”

2:51 我的意思是，正如我所说，我认为未来钱仍然重要。任何人都可以得到自己想要的商品和服务。我也不认为所谓的富人最终会控制AI，我认为他们会控制自己。

3:11 所以你不必划清界限……我认为经济学上的根本误解在于混淆了资源分配和消费。

3:26 一个人能消费的有限，很快就会达到饱和点。所以财富从十亿美元增至百亿美元，并不会让你幸福或有意义增加十倍，也不会拥有十倍的物品。实际上只是资源的分配问题。

3:43 资源分配。

0:00 The future look like money becomes irrelevant. I mean, there will be still a

0:04 currency, but

0:05 I think currency will be measured in fundamental physics metrics like power,

0:10 like wattage and

0:13 tonnage, mass and energy. Mass and power energy, basically. But conventional

0:24 currency will

0:25 not matter in the future, so that's my guess. I think it's pretty obvious. As

0:33 soon as you

0:34 start getting to many orders of magnitude bigger than Earth's economy,

0:38 satisfying whatever

0:39 humans can possibly think of for their needs is very easy. If you're several

0:45 orders of

0:46 magnitude bigger than Earth's economy, then providing humans whatever goods and

0:52 services

0:53 they can think of, that they might want is trivial.

0:57 And so what do we do then as humans? What gives us meaning? How do we organize

1:03 ourselves?

1:04 I mean, do you struggle with this question? We'll find ways to be happy in the

1:12 same way

1:13 that people who retire seem to be relatively fairly happy, even though they're

1:17 not working.

1:18 But I think the reality is that humans will not... There won't be anything that

1:23 humans

1:23 can do that the AI and the robots can't do better. One analogy might be

1:30 gardening, you

1:32 know, where you don't have to grow your own fruits and vegetables, you can just

1:37 go buy

1:37 them from the store. But sometimes people like to grow their own fruits and

1:42 vegetables

1:42 and make dinner for friends, and it's kind of a nice touch.

1:46 What about creating art or that type of creativity? Is that more in the sphere

1:50 of humans?

1:51 Yeah, you could certainly create art or whatever you feel like doing,

1:55 essentially.

1:56 We like to think of this as a time of unprecedented technological change, but

2:01 we historians go

2:02 back to the 1890s when you get electricity and telephones and cars and, you

2:07 know, subways

2:08 and radio and movies, all these things happening at once. And it leads to many

2:14 things, but

2:15 it all often leads to a great disparity of wealth, a lot of sense of robber bar

2:20 ons, a

2:21 lot of people then picking up pitchforks and deciding that this is bad, and

2:25 there's

2:26 some echoes of that now. Is there a way to prevent that given the amount of

2:32 wealth being

2:33 generated where we put certain things in the commons, the way they did in the

2:38 1890s, when

2:39 they make high school, universal and free? Will we say, "Okay, health care, for

2:43 example,

2:44 you'd just be in the commons and that's going to sap some of the populist rev

2:49 ulsion at

2:50 what's happening."

2:51 Well, I mean, as you could me say, I think money's going to matter in the

3:00 future. Like

3:01 anyone would be able to have any goods and services that they want. And I don't

3:05 think

3:05 even so-called wealthy people will ultimately control the AIs. I think they'll

3:09 control themselves.

3:11 So it's not like you have to separate... I think a sort of a fundamental

3:17 misunderstanding

3:19 of economics arises because of conflating resource allocation and consumption.

3:26 So there's a limit

3:27 to what any single human can consume. You hit that saturation point pretty fast

3:32 . So going

3:33 from say $1 billion net worth to $10 billion net worth doesn't make you 10

3:39 times happier

3:40 have meaning or 10 times more stuff. It actually means you've got a resource

3:43 allocation.