0:00
我会说罗宾汉大概有99.3%的可能性或责任
0:07
归咎于它。我的意思是，真的，它是那个
0:10
你用了这个产品，你的朋友用了这个产品
0:13
我全家都在用这个产品。让人开设
0:16
施瓦布或富达账户并积极交易并不容易
0:18
现在罗宾汉把它游戏化了。是的。但这就是
0:21
关键。它需要让人感觉刺激，才会关心
0:24
金融市场。金融市场本身并不
0:25
有趣，除非你让它变得有趣。所以我对罗宾汉做的事情
0:29
完全没有问题。他们显然因此受到很多批评。
0:31
但更多资金进入市场，更多
0:33
流动性是好事，不是坏事。
0:00
I would say Robinhood is probably 99.3% possible or responsible
0:07
for it. I mean, legitimately, it's it's it's it's it is the when
0:10
you've used the product and you get your friends use the product
0:13
and all my family uses the product. It's not easy to get
0:16
someone to open up a Schwab or Fidelity account and actively
0:18
enjoy trading now has Robinhood gamified it. Yeah. But that's
0:21
the point. Like it needs to feel exciting for people to care
0:24
about financial markets. Financial markets are not that
0:25
interesting unless you make it interesting. And so I have zero
0:29
problem with what Robinhood has done. They've obviously got a
0:31
lot of flack for it. But more money in the markets more
0:33
liquidity is a good thing. Not a bad thing.
回复